I am reminded...
Please take a moment to view this clip (close to 5 million people have watched since it was released last year). Feel free to post comments.
Sincerely,
Ralph E. Jordan
CEO & President




“For over 50 years, perfusionists have followed in the footsteps of John H. Gibbon, MD and his wife Mary Gibbon. The first experimental heart-lung machine, built by Dr. Gibbon in 1937, used two roller pumps. One of its first successful uses involved the capacity to replace the heart and lung functions of a cat.Considered the inventor of the heart-lung machine, Dr. John Gibbon also performed the first successful human open heart procedure. On May 6, 1953, while a machine was utilized to maintain life while the surgery was performed, a hole inside a human heart was closed. While Dr. Gibbon prepared the 18-year-old patient, his wife, Mary Gibbon, prepared the heart-lung machine for operation. Mary Gibbon is therefore considered the first ‘perfusionist.’ The patient was connected to the heart-lung machine for 45 minutes. For 26 minutes the heart-lung machine completely supported all circulatory and respiratory functions.”

eed, is how humbly they respond to outpour of celebration by the public to their effort.
assionate effect on the human spirit, which speaks so eloquently to us all. CLICK THIS LINK. In the lyrics of Les Mis's "I Dreamed a Dream," sung by Susan Boyle, these words speak to all of this so eloquently and leave us to ponder even more.... I can't think of a more relevant song choice for this underrated woman who said she'd never been kissed, who dared to imagine a bigger life. The history behind the song resonates. In the Broadway show, Les Mis, the character of Fantine suffers joblessness and destitution. Susan Boyle's passionate performance belts out powerfully about the reality of life's struggles.
Ralph E. Jordan
CEO & President
Trident Health Resources, Inc.
There continues to be a major problem with AmSect’s desire for state mandated professional licensure of all perfusionists. I'd like to call attention to the fact that there is, at present, no workable, fair or real reciprocity between states in the licensing of Perfusionists, even though the GRC claims this to be fact. In the event of a medical emergency, this is a serious situation.
.
To illuminate the problem, here is a case in point: I received a telephone call one Friday afternoon that an ECMO Team was immediately needed in Texas to monitor a baby girl. All my Texas travelers were on assignment and unable to fill the need. In response, however, I inquired at the Texas state's licensing office about any provision in the law for quick licensing for emergencies. My Perfusion staff licensed from other parts of the country could be credentialed, but unfortunately state licensing for an emergent situation in Texas had no provisions, or so I was told. NOTE: The same response was given in MO, TN, and GA when we experienced similar situations in past years.
.
Several state licensing offices charge upwards of $400 to $700 per license annually and yet they are clueless about what a Perfusionist is or does, nor do they seem to care. That is, if you can locate them.
.
In the case of the Texas ECMO baby, patient care suffered and unfortunately there was a negative outcome. I wish I could report that this was a one-time occurrence, but we have experienced similar events a multitude of times over the years as we tried to be of assistance to hospitals and perfusion colleagues who reached out to us. We appealed to the Government Relations Committee through a friend and an associate who was a member and who presented the case in 2007.
.
The issue has been a point of contention for years for many perfusionist who are sole proprietors and for contract companies like Trident, which provide locum tenens services on a national scale.
.
When individual states put their regulations together, supported and directed by AmSect, I wonder: Were they thinking more of exclusion than inclusion? Less about patient-focused care or rights of patients? Is the public welfare served by this endeavor?
.
We approached AmSect about the problem and the response, in my opinion, was idealistic, lacking expansive thought and bordering on irresponsible . That reply is posted here:
.
CLICK HERE for AmSect’s Response
I don't want to make this issue about contract companies such as Trident versus hospital-based or instate perfusion groups, but this protect your turf mentality is not only short-sighted and paranoid, but goes against the precepts of inclusion. I would be interested to hear reader thoughts and any experiences you've had as a contractor or other perfusion providers concerning this topic.
.
This problem is not isolated or regional. It is nationwide. My question is, Where is the leadership? Or, is this the harbinger for new thought for establishing another (more enlightened) organization that will truly support what perfusion and care of the patient is all about?
.
Inclusion or Exclusion? What's your take on this? Oh, by the way, and for the record... We haven’t even touched upon the concept of free enterprise or the restriction of trade or how the public good is served by this endeavor.
.
Please post comments here or email me directly.
.
RALPH E. JORDAN
CEO & President